Science Fiction Community Unites Against AI in Creative Spaces
In recent months, prominent figures in the science fiction and pop culture realms have taken decisive actions to limit the influence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in creative domains. Notably, both the San Diego Comic-Con and the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association (SFWA) have implemented policies reflecting a growing resistance to AI-generated content.
In December, the SFWA revised its Nebula Awards eligibility criteria to exclude works entirely produced by large language models (LLMs). Additionally, authors who incorporated LLMs at any stage of their writing process were required to disclose such usage, allowing voters to consider this factor in their evaluations. This policy change sparked immediate backlash, as it appeared to permit partial AI involvement in submissions. Responding to the concerns, the SFWA Board of Directors issued an apology, acknowledging the distress caused and subsequently amended the rules to disqualify any work created wholly or partially using generative LLM tools.
Jason Sanford, in his Genre Grapevine newsletter, expressed satisfaction with the SFWA’s responsiveness to its members. He personally refrains from using generative AI in his fiction writing, citing concerns over creativity and the essence of storytelling. Sanford also highlighted the need for clear definitions regarding LLM usage, especially as these technologies become increasingly integrated into everyday tools. He cautioned against unfairly disqualifying writers who utilize word processing and research tools with LLM components, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between different levels of AI involvement.
Similarly, the San Diego Comic-Con faced controversy when artists discovered that AI-generated art was permitted for display, though not for sale, at the convention’s art show. Following artist complaints, the rules were updated to explicitly prohibit any material created partially or wholly by AI. Glen Wooten, head of the art show, acknowledged that while previous rules had deterred AI-generated submissions, the escalating issue necessitated a more stringent stance.
These developments underscore a broader movement within creative communities to preserve human originality and craftsmanship in the face of advancing AI technologies. As AI continues to evolve, it is likely that more organizations will establish policies to address its role in creative processes, prompting ongoing discussions about the intersection of technology and artistry.
