[April-26-2025] Daily Cybersecurity Threat Report

Executive Summary

This report details significant cybersecurity incidents observed within the last 24 hours, ending April 26th, 2025. The threat landscape during this period was characterized by a combination of data breach claims, hacktivist operations linked to geopolitical tensions, the offering of malicious tools on underground forums, and initial access brokerage.

Multiple data breaches were alleged, targeting diverse sectors including Financial Services (Paysafe), Food & Beverages (Glovo), Software Development (Universal Mechanism Software Lab), and various Pakistani government and private entities (Euro Oil Pakistan, Supreme Court of AJK, University of Balochistan, Waada, Sindh Police). Notably, the claims against Paysafe and Glovo were made by the same actor, ‘Machine1337’, on the xss.is forum, suggesting a possible common point of compromise, potentially involving a third-party service provider.

Hacktivism remained prominent, reflecting ongoing geopolitical conflicts. ‘INDIAN CYBER FORCE’, a known pro-India group ¹, claimed responsibility for widespread data leaks from Pakistani organizations. Concurrently, another likely pro-India actor, ‘DARK CYBER WARRIOR’ ², claimed to leak access to Pakistani fuel system infrastructure. In parallel, ‘MajorAnon’ targeted a Russian software lab under the ‘#OpRussia’ banner ³, aligning with hacktivism related to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

The cybercrime ecosystem demonstrated continued activity with the advertisement of a modified Remote Access Tool (RAT) based on the legitimate ScreenConnect software by ‘davidwilson6514’ on the exploit.in forum. Additionally, a large-scale data leak involving alleged Danish phone numbers was attributed to ‘RuskiNet’ on X.com, although the claim could not be fully verified due to source accessibility issues.⁴

Key trends observed include the persistent targeting of data across various sectors, the visible manifestation of geopolitical conflicts in cyberspace through hacktivist groups, the commoditization of cybercrime tools and initial access, and the potential for supply chain compromises leading to multiple downstream breaches.

Table 1: Summary of Reported Incidents (April 26th, 2025)

Date Reported (UTC)	Incident Title	Victim Organization(s)	Victim Country	Category	Alleged Threat Actor(s)	Source Network
2025-04-26T11:10:56Z	Alleged database leak of Paysafe	paysafe	UK	Data Breach	Machine1337	openweb (xss.is)
2025-04-26T10:48:52Z	Alleged database leak of Glovo	glovo	Spain	Data Breach	Machine1337	openweb (xss.is)
2025-04-26T09:07:35Z	Alleged database leak of Universal Mechanism Software Lab	universal mechanism software lab	Russia	Data Breach	MajorAnon	openweb (X.com)
2025-04-26T08:55:58Z	Alleged database leak of Pakistani government and private sector	euro oil pakistan, Supreme Court of AJK, University of Balochistan, Waada, Sindh Police	Pakistan	Data Breach	INDIAN CYBER FORCE	telegram
2025-04-26T06:33:05Z	Alleged leak of access to Pakistan’s VNC Fusion ECO FUEL SYSTEM	Unspecified entity related to “VNC Fusion ECO FUEL SYSTEM”	Pakistan	Initial Access	DARK CYBER WARRIOR	telegram
2025-04-26T01:50:26Z	Alleged Sale of ScreenConnect-Based RAT	Not Applicable (Tool Sale)	N/A	Malware	davidwilson6514	openweb (exploit.in)
2025-04-26T01:14:03Z	Alleged data leak of Danish phone numbers	Potentially 6 million individuals in Denmark	Denmark	Data Leak	RuskiNet	openweb (X.com)

Detailed Incident Analysis

A. Incident: Alleged database leak of Paysafe

Summary: A threat actor operating under the alias ‘Machine1337’ posted a claim on the xss.is cybercrime forum, asserting they have leaked a database belonging to Paysafe. The actor specified that the compromised data includes fields such as Timestamp, Sender, Number (Destination), Provider Status, and Provider Message ID.
Victim: Paysafe (paysafe.com), a company operating in the Financial Services sector, based in the UK.
Category/Network: Data Breach / openweb (xss.is forum).
Date: 2025-04-26T11:10:56Z.
Threat Actor Profile (Machine1337): Specific intelligence detailing the history or TTPs of ‘Machine1337’ is not readily available in open sources or common threat intelligence repositories referenced.⁵ The chosen alias, combining “Machine” with “1337” (leetspeak for “elite”), is stylistically common within hacker and cybercrime subcultures. The actor’s choice of platform, xss.is, a prominent Russian-language forum known for facilitating cybercriminal activities, suggests a potential connection or alignment with the Eastern European cybercrime ecosystem. Based on the nature of the claimed action – leaking database information allegedly from a financial services firm – the actor’s primary motivation appears to be financial gain, potentially through selling the data or leveraging it for other illicit purposes. This aligns with the profile of financially motivated cybercriminals or crime syndicates.⁸ The technical capability required to access and exfiltrate database contents is implied, although the exact method remains unknown. A significant observation is the near-simultaneous claim by the same actor against Glovo (detailed in Section III.B), posted on the same forum. This proximity in time and platform, coupled with identical descriptions of the leaked data structure for both incidents, strongly suggests the data may originate from a single source rather than two independent breaches. This could point towards a compromise of a shared third-party service provider utilized by both Paysafe and Glovo, possibly related to messaging or transaction processing services, indicating a potential supply chain attack vector.
Incident Specifics & Analysis: The type of data allegedly compromised – primarily metadata related to transactions or communications – could be exploited for various malicious activities. While not containing direct financial account numbers or passwords, this information can be valuable for conducting sophisticated phishing attacks, social engineering, tracking user activity, or potentially uncovering operational patterns of the victim organization. The impact hinges on the volume, sensitivity, and accuracy of the leaked data, representing a significant privacy concern for individuals whose information might be included and an operational security risk for Paysafe.
Supporting Evidence:

Published URL: https://xss.is/threads/136721/
Screenshot: https://d34iuop8pidsy8.cloudfront.net/6bdb577b-6c48-47cc-a8db-fa8aad6369e9.PNG

B. Incident: Alleged database leak of Glovo

Summary: Shortly before the Paysafe claim, the same threat actor, ‘Machine1337’, posted on xss.is alleging a database leak from Glovo, a Spain-based company in the Food & Beverages delivery sector. The description of the compromised data – Timestamp, Sender, Number (Destination), Provider Status, Provider Message ID – is identical to the data claimed in the Paysafe incident.
Victim: Glovo (glovoapp.com), Food & Beverages, Spain.
Category/Network: Data Breach / openweb (xss.is forum).
Date: 2025-04-26T10:48:52Z.
Threat Actor Profile (Machine1337): The assessment for ‘Machine1337’ remains consistent with the analysis in Section III.A. This second claim, made minutes before the Paysafe announcement on the same forum (xss.is), reinforces the likelihood of a connection between the two incidents. The repetition of the exact data field descriptions (“Time, Sender\tNumber (Destination), Provider Status, Provider Message ID”) across claims targeting two different companies in distinct sectors (Financial Services vs. Food Delivery) makes independent, simultaneous breaches with identical data outcomes highly improbable. This pattern strongly supports the hypothesis that ‘Machine1337’ either compromised a common third-party vendor supplying services (e.g., SMS notifications, communication APIs) to both Glovo and Paysafe, or acquired both datasets from another source who conducted such a breach. This highlights the cascading risks associated with supply chain vulnerabilities, where a single compromise can impact multiple organizations.⁹
Incident Specifics & Analysis: For a delivery service like Glovo, the leaked metadata could pertain to order confirmations, delivery updates, or communications between customers, restaurants, and couriers. Similar to the Paysafe incident, this leak poses significant privacy risks for users and could expose operational details of Glovo’s service. The potential value lies in correlating user activity, enabling targeted scams, or understanding communication flows.
Supporting Evidence:

Published URL: https://xss.is/threads/136720/
Screenshot: https://d34iuop8pidsy8.cloudfront.net/15fba118-2aa4-416b-9136-d7d862aa6839.PNG

C. Incident: Alleged database leak of Universal Mechanism Software Lab

Summary: An entity identified as ‘MajorAnon’ claimed responsibility via a post on X (formerly Twitter) for dumping the database of Universal Mechanism Software Lab (umlab.ru), a software development company based in Russia. The post included hashtags “#OpRussia” and “#RussiaIsATerroristState”.³
Victim: Universal Mechanism Software Lab (umlab.ru), Software Development, Russia.
Category/Network: Data Breach / openweb (X.com).
Date: 2025-04-26T09:07:35Z.
Threat Actor Profile (MajorAnon): Specific threat intelligence profiles for ‘MajorAnon’ are not available in the referenced materials.¹² However, the actor’s chosen name incorporates “Anon,” suggesting an ideological alignment with the Anonymous hacktivist collective. This is strongly corroborated by the explicit anti-Russian hashtags used in their claim.³ The use of X.com for disseminating the claim is also a common practice among hacktivist groups seeking public attention and propaganda value.¹ Therefore, ‘MajorAnon’ is assessed as a hacktivist entity motivated by political opposition to Russia, likely participating in cyber operations related to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. Their actions fall under the category of ideologically motivated threat actors.⁹ The claimed database dump indicates a capability to exploit web vulnerabilities or gain unauthorized access to database servers, common tactics in hacktivism.¹ The targeting of a seemingly non-military or non-critical infrastructure entity like a software lab could indicate several possibilities: it might be an opportunistic attack exploiting an easily discovered vulnerability, or it could be a deliberate choice to target entities perceived as contributing to Russia’s technological sector or economy, even if less prominent. This type of targeting aligns with the often decentralized and varied nature of broad hacktivist campaigns like #OpRussia, which may involve numerous actors with differing capabilities attacking a wide range of targets.¹⁶
Incident Specifics & Analysis: The specific contents of the allegedly leaked database were not detailed in the initial claim description. Depending on the nature of Universal Mechanism Software Lab’s work, the database could contain sensitive information such as proprietary source code, project details, intellectual property, internal company communications, employee data, or potentially client information. A successful breach and data leak could lead to significant operational disruption, reputational damage, financial loss, and compromise of client confidentiality for the software lab. Verification of the claim and assessment of the actual impact depend on the content shared through the provided links.³
Supporting Evidence:

Published URL: https://x.com/YourAnonMajor_/status/1915861645236089051 (Source indicates the claim was posted here ³)
Screenshot: https://d34iuop8pidsy8.cloudfront.net/1eef3125-c5e2-49c8-ac4a-9d12025f2e75.png

D. Incident: Alleged database leak of Pakistani government and private sector

Summary: The hacktivist group ‘INDIAN CYBER FORCE’ announced via their Telegram channel that they have leaked databases allegedly belonging to several Pakistani organizations. The named entities include Euro Oil Pakistan, the Supreme Court of Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK), the University of Balochistan, an entity named Waada (potentially related to insurance or finance), and the Sindh Police.
Victim(s): Euro Oil Pakistan (euro.com.pk), Supreme Court of AJK, University of Balochistan, Waada, Sindh Police. These represent diverse sectors including Oil & Gas, Government/Judiciary, Education, Finance/Insurance (presumed for Waada), and Law Enforcement, all located in Pakistan.
Category/Network: Data Breach / telegram.
Date: 2025-04-26T08:55:58Z.
Threat Actor Profile (INDIAN CYBER FORCE – ICF): INDIAN CYBER FORCE (ICF) is a recognized hacktivist group originating from India, documented as active since at least 2022.¹ The group explicitly targets entities perceived as anti-India or associated with geopolitical rivals, with Pakistan being a primary and frequent target.¹ Their motivations are openly nationalistic, sometimes described as linked to Hindu nationalism.¹ ICF utilizes public platforms like Telegram and X (formerly Twitter) to announce their activities and claim responsibility for attacks.¹ Their known Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) include Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, website defacements, vulnerability exploitation leading to data breaches, and public exposure of stolen data or gained access.¹ Past campaigns attributed to ICF include attacks against Canadian government websites following diplomatic tensions ¹, Palestinian entities during the Israel-Hamas conflict ¹, Qatari organizations ¹, Maldivian government sites during diplomatic disputes ¹, and Bangladeshi network infrastructure.¹ They have been noted as one of the more active hacktivist groups globally.¹ This current claim aligns perfectly with their established profile: targeting multiple high-profile Pakistani entities across various sectors reflects their stated anti-Pakistan stance and nationalistic motivations, consistent with the long-standing geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan.¹⁸ The targeting of diverse organizations (energy, judiciary, education, law enforcement, private sector) in a single announcement suggests a coordinated campaign aimed at demonstrating broad impact within Pakistan, rather than isolated opportunistic breaches. This level of coordination points towards a degree of organization and capability within the group to identify and potentially exploit vulnerabilities across different infrastructures.¹
Incident Specifics & Analysis: The alleged leak of databases from such a diverse set of Pakistani organizations poses significant risks. Data from Euro Oil could include commercially sensitive information or details related to energy infrastructure. Leaks from the Supreme Court of AJK and Sindh Police could expose sensitive legal records, case details, citizen information, and internal government communications. University data might contain student and staff personal identifiable information (PII) and academic records. Data from Waada could involve financial or insurance policyholder details. Collectively, such leaks could cause severe reputational damage, disrupt operations, compromise national security, facilitate further cybercrime (identity theft, fraud), and be used for intelligence gathering or propaganda purposes. The credibility and impact depend on the actual data leaked via the group’s Telegram channel.
Supporting Evidence:

Published URL: https://t.me/TeamIndianCyberForce/3158
Screenshot: https://d34iuop8pidsy8.cloudfront.net/b3fa50db-854e-4274-aeca-51b12c0077fa.png

E. Incident: Alleged leak of access to Pakistan’s VNC Fusion ECO FUEL SYSTEM

Summary: A threat actor using the handle ‘DARK CYBER WARRIOR’ claimed via Telegram to have leaked access to a system described as “Pakistan’s VNC Fusion ECO FUEL SYSTEM.” The specific organization associated with this system was not identified. The nature of the leak appears to be initial access credentials or connection details rather than a static database dump.
Victim: An unspecified entity in Pakistan associated with a “VNC Fusion ECO FUEL SYSTEM.” Based on the description, the industry is likely related to Energy, Fuel Distribution/Management, or associated Technology/Infrastructure.
Category/Network: Initial Access / telegram.
Date: 2025-04-26T06:33:05Z.
Threat Actor Profile (DARK CYBER WARRIOR): While the name ‘DARK CYBER WARRIOR’ appears generic and lacks extensive dedicated profiles in some threat intelligence databases ⁹, research indicates its usage by a specific group. Notably, ‘Dark Cyber Warrior’ was identified as one of several ‘Pro-India’ hacktivist groups involved in cyber operations targeting Maldivian institutions during the India-Maldives diplomatic row earlier in the year, operating alongside groups like INDIAN CYBER FORCE.² Based on this association and the current targeting of Pakistani infrastructure, ‘DARK CYBER WARRIOR’ is assessed as another politically motivated, pro-India hacktivist group. Their modus operandi likely involves identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access, which they then publicize via platforms like Telegram to achieve their nationalistic or disruptive goals. The claim occurring shortly after the multi-target claims by INDIAN CYBER FORCE (Section III.D) further reinforces the picture of a concentrated wave of pro-India hacktivist activity directed against Pakistan.² A significant aspect of this incident is the category: ‘Initial Access’. Leaking or selling access credentials or methods is distinct from leaking static data. It provides potentially multiple malicious actors with the means to directly interact with the compromised system, enabling real-time monitoring, data manipulation, further network intrusion, or potentially causing physical disruption if the system controls operational technology (OT) or critical infrastructure elements related to fuel.¹¹ This tactic could represent an escalation or variation in methods used by these hacktivist groups, moving beyond data exposure towards enabling direct impact.
Incident Specifics & Analysis: The description “VNC Fusion ECO FUEL SYSTEM” is ambiguous but implies a system related to fuel management or logistics, accessed via VNC (Virtual Network Computing), a common remote desktop protocol. Compromise and public leakage of access to such a system, particularly if linked to critical fuel infrastructure, is a serious concern. Unauthorized access could allow observation of fuel inventories or distribution, disruption of logistics, or potentially manipulation of control settings depending on the system’s function and privileges associated with the leaked access. The potential for targeting energy infrastructure aligns with broader concerns about attacks on critical sectors.¹¹ Verification requires examining the details shared on the specified Telegram channel.
Supporting Evidence:

Published URL: https://t.me/DarkCyberWarrior/22
Screenshot: https://d34iuop8pidsy8.cloudfront.net/cef54c5c-a686-431e-afff-a880e1213efd.png

F. Incident: Alleged Sale of ScreenConnect-Based RAT

Summary: An actor identified as ‘davidwilson6514’ posted an advertisement on the exploit.in underground forum, offering a modified version of ScreenConnect (now ConnectWise Control) repurposed as a Remote Access Tool (RAT). The advertisement highlights features tailored for malicious use, including unattended access, hidden screen/mouse functionality, integration with two-factor authentication (potentially implying bypass or manipulation), system persistence mechanisms, and capabilities to disable security software like Windows Defender and Task Manager. The offering reportedly includes a web-based control panel, cloud backups, bulk session management, and options for custom development, promising high uptime and resilient hosting.
Victim: Not applicable directly; the offering targets potential buyers within the cybercrime community who would use the tool against their own victims.
Category/Network: Malware / openweb (exploit.in forum).
Date: 2025-04-26T01:50:26Z.
Threat Actor Profile (davidwilson6514): No specific background information on the alias ‘davidwilson6514’ was found in the referenced materials. The actor’s activity – developing and selling a malicious tool on exploit.in, a well-known Russian-centric cybercrime marketplace – clearly positions them as a financially motivated participant in the cybercrime ecosystem. They function as a tool provider, catering to other malicious actors. The advertised features (stealth, persistence, security evasion) are designed to make the RAT effective for covert operations such as spam campaigns, long-term espionage, data theft, or facilitating ransomware deployment.²⁰ The strategy of modifying legitimate remote access software like ScreenConnect is a common Tactic, Technique, and Procedure (TTP) known as Living-off-the-Land (LOTL) or abuse of dual-use tools.²⁸ This approach can help bypass basic security detections that might flag unknown executables but allow traffic associated with known software. Recent high-profile vulnerabilities in ScreenConnect, such as CVE-2024-1709 exploited by state-sponsored actors ²⁹, may have increased its attractiveness as a base for malicious tool development due to wider exploit availability and potentially existing footholds. This actor contributes directly to the cybercrime supply chain by providing tools that enable various attacks similar to those involving web shells, other RATs like Quasar RAT, and exploitation of vulnerabilities for payload delivery.³⁰
Incident Specifics & Analysis: This advertisement represents a threat by equipping other malicious actors with a potentially potent tool. The modification of legitimate software aims to complicate detection. Features like disabling security tools (Defender, Task Manager) directly counter common endpoint defenses. The inclusion of a web panel and bulk management suggests the tool is designed for managing multiple compromises efficiently. Organizations using ScreenConnect/ConnectWise Control legitimately should be particularly vigilant, ensuring their instances are fully patched and monitored for anomalous behavior, as compromised or maliciously modified versions pose a significant risk. The sale of such tools lowers the barrier to entry for less sophisticated attackers and provides enhanced capabilities for established cybercriminals.
Supporting Evidence:

Published URL: https://forum.exploit.in/topic/258046/
Screenshot: https://d34iuop8pidsy8.cloudfront.net/878af070-e32a-4f74-8d70-2bc0948a7721.png

G. Incident: Alleged data leak of Danish phone numbers

Summary: A threat actor using the name ‘RuskiNet’ claimed via a post on X (formerly Twitter) to possess and be listing a database containing 6 million phone numbers belonging to individuals in Denmark.
Victim: Potentially 6 million individuals in Denmark whose phone numbers are included in the alleged dataset.
Category/Network: Data Leak / openweb (X.com).
Date: 2025-04-26T01:14:03Z.
Threat Actor Profile (RuskiNet): There is no specific intelligence available in the provided sources regarding a group or individual named ‘RuskiNet’.¹⁶ The name itself, however, strongly suggests a Russian affiliation or the adoption of a Russian persona. The act of leaking a large volume of personal data (phone numbers) targeting a specific Western nation (Denmark) via a public platform like X aligns with activities observed from various Russian-nexus threat actors, including state-sponsored groups and associated hacktivists.¹⁶ Motivations for such leaks can vary: political disruption (undermining trust, causing public anxiety, retaliating for geopolitical stances against Russia), financial gain (selling the data on underground markets), or enabling further malicious activities (large-scale smishing/vishing campaigns, intelligence gathering by linking numbers to other data). Given Denmark’s status as an EU and NATO member, politically motivated disruption or intelligence gathering cannot be ruled out, consistent with documented Russian cyber strategies targeting Western nations.¹⁷ The scale of the claim (6 million numbers) is significant relative to Denmark’s population (approximately 5.9 million), implying a potentially major breach at a telecommunications provider, large service provider, or government entity, or the aggregation of data from multiple sources. The use of X suggests a desire for publicity and potentially maximizing the psychological impact of the claim. Unfortunately, the provided published_url was found to be inaccessible ⁴, preventing verification of the claim or gathering further context directly from the actor’s post.
Incident Specifics & Analysis: If accurate, the leak of 6 million Danish phone numbers constitutes a massive privacy breach. Phone numbers are valuable PII often used as identifiers or for account recovery, making them useful for various forms of fraud, identity theft, and social engineering (especially smishing and vishing). Such a large dataset could fuel extensive spam and scam campaigns targeting the Danish population, potentially eroding trust in digital communications and institutions. The source of such a comprehensive list would likely be a major data holder. While the claim’s veracity is unconfirmed due to the inaccessible link ⁴, the potential impact warrants attention from Danish authorities and organizations.
Supporting Evidence:

Published URL: https://x.com/ruskinetgroup/status/1915863840836968744?s=46&t=nYjQW6ksYSqdKwzL7fb5jA (Noted as inaccessible ⁴)
Screenshot: https://d34iuop8pidsy8.cloudfront.net/fe6e4ff7-e47c-472a-bb7a-a10a96ac0939.png

Emerging Trends & Thematic Analysis

Analysis of the incidents reported on April 26th, 2025, reveals several interconnected themes shaping the current cyber threat landscape.

Geopolitical Tensions Manifesting as Cyber Conflict: A significant portion of the observed activity is directly linked to ongoing international disputes. The coordinated claims by INDIAN CYBER FORCE ¹ and DARK CYBER WARRIOR ² against a wide array of Pakistani targets underscore the persistent use of cyber operations, primarily by hacktivist groups, as a tool in the India-Pakistan conflict.¹⁸ Similarly, the #OpRussia claim by ‘MajorAnon’ ³ targeting a Russian entity reflects the cyber dimension of the Russia-Ukraine war, where hacktivism serves purposes of disruption, propaganda, and demonstrating opposition.¹⁶ The ‘RuskiNet’ claim against Denmark, while unverified ⁴, fits the pattern of Russian-nexus actors targeting Western nations for political or intelligence motives.¹⁷ These incidents collectively show that hacktivism remains a highly visible and active component of modern statecraft and conflict, often conducted openly on public platforms like Telegram and X.¹
Prevalence of Data Breaches and Leaks: Data remains a highly sought-after commodity, evidenced by the multiple alleged breaches and leaks reported (Paysafe, Glovo, UMSL, Pakistani entities, Danish numbers). The targets span diverse industries and geographies, indicating the universal value placed on sensitive information by various threat actors. A particularly noteworthy pattern emerged from the ‘Machine1337’ claims against Paysafe and Glovo. The identical actor, timing, platform, and crucially, the identical structure of the allegedly leaked data strongly suggest these were not independent breaches. Instead, this points towards a potential compromise of a common upstream service provider or a shared technological component used by both companies. This underscores the critical importance of third-party risk management and the potential for supply chain compromises to have widespread downstream effects, impacting multiple organizations through a single point of failure. Large-scale leaks, like the alleged 6 million Danish phone numbers, highlight the ongoing threat to personal data privacy at a population level, often stemming from breaches at major data aggregators or essential service providers.
Cybercrime Ecosystem: Tooling and Access: The cybercrime economy continues to thrive, facilitating attacks through the provision of specialized tools and access. The advertisement of the modified ScreenConnect RAT by ‘davidwilson6514’ exemplifies the supply side of this ecosystem. By repurposing legitimate software ²⁹ and adding malicious features (stealth, persistence, security bypass), tool developers lower the technical barrier for less skilled actors and provide enhanced capabilities for sophisticated campaigns like spamming, espionage, or ransomware deployment.²⁰ This trend of abusing legitimate tools (LOTL) remains a significant challenge for defenders. Complementing the tool market is the trade in initial access. The claim by ‘DARK CYBER WARRIOR’ to leak access to a Pakistani system illustrates that actors monetize not just stolen data, but also the means to infiltrate systems. This brokering of access allows buyers to bypass the initial intrusion phase and proceed directly to their objectives, potentially enabling more immediate and impactful attacks, especially if the access relates to critical systems.

Table 2: Threat Actor Summary (April 26th, 2025)

Threat Actor Name	Associated Incidents (Title/Victim)	Assessed Motivation	Key Characteristics/TTPs (Brief)	Confidence Level
Machine1337	Alleged database leak of Paysafe; Alleged database leak of Glovo	Financial	Data breach claims via xss.is; Likely exploited shared resource/supply chain based on identical data structures claimed.	Medium
MajorAnon	Alleged database leak of Universal Mechanism Software Lab	Political (Hacktivist)	Anti-Russia (#OpRussia); Database dump claim via X.com; Anonymous affiliation implied.	Medium
INDIAN CYBER FORCE	Alleged database leak of Pakistani government and private sector (Euro Oil, Supreme Court AJK, U. Balochistan, Waada, Sindh Police)	Political (Hacktivist)	Pro-India; Known group ¹; Targets Pakistan/others; Uses Telegram/X; TTPs: DDoS, Defacement, Data Leaks.¹	High
DARK CYBER WARRIOR	Alleged leak of access to Pakistan’s VNC Fusion ECO FUEL SYSTEM	Political (Hacktivist)	Pro-India ²; Targets Pakistan/others; Leaked Initial Access via Telegram; Likely associated with ICF activities.²	Medium-High
davidwilson6514	Alleged Sale of ScreenConnect-Based RAT	Financial	Malware/Tool vendor on exploit.in; Modifies legitimate software (ScreenConnect) for malicious use (RAT); Enables other actors.	High
RuskiNet	Alleged data leak of Danish phone numbers	Unclear (Potentially Pol/Fin)	Russian persona implied; Large-scale data leak claim (6M phone numbers) via X.com; Target: Denmark; Link inaccessible.⁴	Low-Medium

Conclusion & Recommendations

The cybersecurity events of April 26th, 2025, underscore a dynamic threat environment where geopolitical motivations intersect with financially driven cybercrime. Hacktivist groups continue to leverage cyber operations as tools in international conflicts, targeting government and critical infrastructure, while cybercriminals focus on data theft, tool development, and access brokerage. The potential compromise of shared third-party services, as suggested by the Paysafe and Glovo incidents, highlights the interconnectedness of risks in the digital ecosystem.

Organizations must maintain a proactive and layered security posture to mitigate these diverse threats. Based on the observed activities and established best practices, the following general recommendations are pertinent:

Strengthen Vulnerability Management: Implement rigorous and timely patching schedules, particularly for internet-facing systems, web applications, and remote access software like VPNs, RDP, VNC, and ConnectWise Control/ScreenConnect.²⁹ Prioritize patching based on evidence of exploitation in the wild, referencing resources like CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.¹¹
Enhance Access Controls: Enforce strong, unique passwords and mandate multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all services, prioritizing phishing-resistant methods such as FIDO2 security keys or authenticator apps with passkey support over SMS/telephony-based MFA where possible.²⁹ Regularly review user privileges based on the principle of least privilege and monitor for signs of credential compromise or misuse.¹²
Improve Threat Detection and Response: Deploy and maintain robust endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions, network security monitoring tools, and centralized logging (SIEM). Configure detections for common malicious TTPs, including the execution of suspicious scripts, web shell activity ³⁰, abuse of legitimate tools (LOLBAS) ²⁷, credential dumping attempts (e.g., LSASS) ²⁹, and unusual data exfiltration patterns. Leverage threat intelligence feeds to inform detection rules and hunting activities.⁵
Bolster Security Awareness: Conduct regular security awareness training for all employees, focusing on recognizing phishing emails, spear-phishing attempts, malicious attachments/links, and social engineering tactics, which remain primary initial access vectors.¹²
Implement Third-Party Risk Management: Develop processes to assess and monitor the security posture of critical vendors, suppliers, and service providers. Understand data sharing agreements and ensure contractual obligations for security are in place, recognizing that their security failures can directly impact your organization.
Prepare for Denial of Service Attacks: Organizations potentially targeted by hacktivists or operating critical services should ensure they have adequate DDoS mitigation strategies and services deployed to maintain availability.¹

Continuous vigilance, adaptation to evolving TTPs, and adherence to fundamental security hygiene are essential for defending against the multifaceted cyber threats observed in today’s landscape.

Works cited

Indian Cyber Force – Wikipedia, accessed April 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Cyber_Force
Cybercriminals are Targeting Elections in India with Influence Campaigns – Resecurity, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.resecurity.com/blog/article/cybercriminals-are-targeting-elections-in-india-with-influence-campaigns
MajorAnon on X: “We have successfully dumped https://t.co …, accessed April 26, 2025, https://x.com/YourAnonMajor_/status/1915861645236089051
accessed January 1, 1970, https://x.com/ruskinetgroup/status/1915863840836968744?s=46&t=nYjQW6ksYSqdKwzL7fb5jA
Cyber Threat Profile | Google Cloud, accessed April 26, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/security/resources/datasheets/cyber-threat-profile
Threat Actor Profiles – SOCRadar® Cyber Intelligence Inc., accessed April 26, 2025, https://socradar.io/category/threat-actor-profiles/
Threat Actor Profiles – Cyble, accessed April 26, 2025, https://cyble.com/threat-actor-profiles/
Identifying a Threat Actor Profile, accessed April 26, 2025, https://oasis-open.github.io/cti-documentation/examples/identifying-a-threat-actor-profile.html
What are the Types of Cyber Threat Actors? – Sophos, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.sophos.com/en-us/cybersecurity-explained/threat-actors
The Silent Cyber Warrior of North Korea – Security Solutions Media, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.securitysolutionsmedia.com/2024/08/09/the-silent-cyber-warrior-of-north-korea/
THE CHANGING : CYBER THREAT LANDSCAPE ASIA-PACIFIC (APAC) REGION – Volume 1 – CYFIRMA, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.cyfirma.com/research/the-changing-cyber-threat-landscape-asia-pacific-apac-region-volume-1-2/
What is a Cyber Threat Actor? | CrowdStrike, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/cybersecurity-101/threat-intelligence/threat-actor/
Threat Actor Profile: Molerats – SOCRadar® Cyber Intelligence Inc., accessed April 26, 2025, https://socradar.io/threat-actor-profile-molerats/
Unmasking Attackers & Decoding Threat Actor Patterns – Flashpoint, accessed April 26, 2025, https://flashpoint.io/blog/threat-actor-profiles/
Pro-India Hacker Group Claims Responsibility for Cyberattack on Canadian Forces Website, accessed April 26, 2025, https://m.thewire.in/article/world/pro-india-hacker-group-claims-responsibility-for-cyberattack-on-canadian-forces-website
Threat Actor Profile: Peoples Cyber Army of Russia – Cyble, accessed April 26, 2025, https://cyble.com/threat-actor-profiles/peoples-cyber-army-of-russia/
The Top 5 Russian Cyber Threat Actors to Watch | Rapid7 Blog, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/03/03/the-top-5-russian-cyber-threat-actors-to-watch/
Interpreting India’s Cyber Statecraft | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, accessed April 26, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/03/interpreting-indias-cyber-statecraft?lang=en
Threat Actor Groups Tracked by Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, accessed April 26, 2025, https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/threat-actor-groups-tracked-by-palo-alto-networks-unit-42/
black-basta-threat-profile.pdf – HHS.gov, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/black-basta-threat-profile.pdf
North Korean Cyber Activity – HHS.gov, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/dprk-cyber-espionage.pdf
Cyber Warriors: From the Dark Web to the Frontlines | Innovation Heroes, accessed April 26, 2025, https://shiinnovationheroes.podbean.com/e/cyber-warriors-from-the-dark-web-to-the-frontlines/
Cyber Warriors: From the Dark Web to the Frontlines – YouTube, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCH3b5RjE9E
What Is a Cyber Warrior? The Emergence of U.S. Military Cyber Expertise, 1967–2018, accessed April 26, 2025, https://tnsr.org/2021/01/what-is-a-cyber-warrior-the-emergence-of-u-s-military-cyber-expertise-1967-2018/
Your first line of defense against adversaries – Dragos, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.dragos.com/threat-groups/
HC3 releases threat profile on Qilin ransomware targeting global healthcare, other critical sectors – Industrial Cyber, accessed April 26, 2025, https://industrialcyber.co/medical/hc3-releases-threat-profile-on-qilin-ransomware-targeting-global-healthcare-other-critical-sectors/
Microsoft Warns of Ransomware Gangs Exploit Cloud Environments with New Techniques, accessed April 26, 2025, https://gbhackers.com/ransomware-gangs-exploit-cloud-environments/
Malvertising campaign leads to info stealers hosted on GitHub | Microsoft Security Blog, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/03/06/malvertising-campaign-leads-to-info-stealers-hosted-on-github/
The BadPilot campaign: Seashell Blizzard subgroup conducts multiyear global access operation | Microsoft Security Blog, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/02/12/the-badpilot-campaign-seashell-blizzard-subgroup-conducts-multiyear-global-access-operation/
XE Hacker Group Exploits VeraCore Zero-Day to Deploy Persistent Web Shells, accessed April 26, 2025, https://thehackernews.com/2025/02/xe-hacker-group-exploits-veracore-zero.html
Hackers Exploit Severe PHP Flaw to Deploy Quasar RAT and XMRig Miners, accessed April 26, 2025, https://thehackernews.com/2025/03/hackers-exploit-severe-php-flaw-to.html
Threat Actors Embed Malware in WordPress Sites to Enable Remote Code Execution, accessed April 26, 2025, https://gbhackers.com/threat-actors-embed-malware-in-wordpress-sites/
Will the Real Msiexec Please Stand Up? Exploit Leads to Data Exfiltration – The DFIR Report, accessed April 26, 2025, https://thedfirreport.com/2022/06/06/will-the-real-msiexec-please-stand-up-exploit-leads-to-data-exfiltration/
Threat group analysis / IRIS Threat Group Profile report – IBM, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/uax?topic=intelligence-threat-group
Russian Threat Actors Targeting the HPH Sector – HHS.gov, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/russian-threat-actors-targeting-the-hph-sector-tlpclear.pdf
Evolving Tactics: How Russian APT Groups Are Shaping Cyber Threats in 2024 | Flashpoint, accessed April 26, 2025, https://flashpoint.io/blog/russian-apt-groups-cyber-threats/
Cyber Threat Group Profiles: Their Objectives, Aliases, and Malware Tools | Secureworks, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.secureworks.com/research/threat-profiles
Groups | MITRE ATT&CK®, accessed April 26, 2025, https://attack.mitre.org/groups
Hacktivists unmasked | Group-IB Blog, accessed April 26, 2025, https://www.group-ib.com/blog/uicf/